Recommended, scheduled and completed care are different
A recommendation for future treatment is not the same as a scheduled procedure, and a scheduled procedure is not the same as completed care. TSC keeps those stages separate rather than treating them as interchangeable.
Specific medical support matters
Future-care analysis is stronger when the record identifies the treatment, the condition it addresses, the provider's recommendation and the clinical reason for it rather than relying on a broad possibility of additional care.
Cost support should match the proposed care
Estimates, facility quotes, physician charges, therapy plans and other cost information can provide context. The amount used in an evaluation should be tied to the care actually being considered rather than an unsupported round number.
Ongoing care can include more than surgery
Future treatment may include specialist follow-up, therapy, medication, diagnostic testing, injections, RFA, surgery, rehabilitation, equipment or other medically supported care depending on the injury.
Future care affects claim value differently from coverage
A supported future medical need may affect an assessment of damages, while available insurance and other recovery sources affect practical recovery. TSC keeps those concepts separate.
Uncertainty should be disclosed, not hidden
When future care is only possible, not yet recommended, or the cost is unknown, the uncertainty should be shown rather than converted into a hidden multiplier or assumed dollar amount.